The X2 with the same function as Xenpak, but with a smaller size that allows more port density. Figure 1 and the below list shows the comparison between XENPAK and X2 optics.
Figure 1 Typical Xenpak,XPAK vs X2
A brief comparison between XENPAK and X2
Transceivers |
X2 |
XPAK |
XENPAK |
|
Mechanical Dimension |
Smallest |
Bigger |
Biggest |
|
Data Rate |
10Gb/s |
10Gb/s |
10Gb/s |
|
Types |
CX4,SR,LR,LRM,ER,
ZR,CWDM,DWDM |
CX4,SR,LR,LRM,ER,
ZR,CWDM,DWDM |
CX4,SR,LR,LRM,ER,
ZR,CWDM,DWDM |
|
Interface |
XAUI |
XAUI |
XAUI |
|
Standard |
X2 MSA |
XPAK MSA |
XENPAK MSA |
|
Connector |
Copper or SC |
Copper or SC |
Copper or SC |
|
Price |
A litter lower |
NA |
higher |
SFP+ module,
SFP+ transceiver,
bidi sfp,
XFP module,
XFP transceiver Which is good? First choice Fiberland!Thanks for your concern, to learn more about Fiberland, please enter Fiberland website:
http://www.fiberlandtec.com/